[VIEWED 9722
TIMES]
|
SAVE! for ease of future access.
|
|
|
WikiLeaks
Please log in to subscribe to WikiLeaks's postings.
Posted on 12-16-10 8:50
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
|
|
|
|
kalopani
Please log in to subscribe to kalopani's postings.
Posted on 12-17-10 4:37
AM [Snapshot: 189]
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
2
?
Liked by
|
|
Freaking Nepali people all they do is politics to show other down.and what's with the letter it sounds so cocky? Acting like alex haig was their langutey friend from back home.
|
|
|
Allegro
Please log in to subscribe to Allegro's postings.
Posted on 12-17-10 11:48
AM [Snapshot: 338]
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
I know it sounds cocky to me as well. WTF with all that Nixon and Watergate stuffs? Man, these idiots are just smart ass.
|
|
|
dhhirajojha
Please log in to subscribe to dhhirajojha's postings.
Posted on 12-17-10 12:00
PM [Snapshot: 360]
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
they are all gay people ......long live the gay people...........lol
|
|
|
chaurey
Please log in to subscribe to chaurey's postings.
Posted on 12-17-10 12:28
PM [Snapshot: 375]
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
What significant and notable thing has this organization done that stands out and makes me proud to say that ANA has contributed to Nepal and Nepalese? As powerful as the organization is, ANA still has the capability to help contribute a lot to the Nepal and Nepalese people if they really want to. However, with their internal political drama, greed and differences they have been limited to a joke of an organization. I tip my hat off to people who actually get their hands dirty and make stuff happen and not all ANA members fall under the category of working for their own benefit. There are few people within the organization who are genuinely working to help the cause this organization was built to do, but their minority voices are over shadowed by these greed mongers running the show. How come an organization registered as a non profit org has not publicly disclosed it's accounts (for god knows how many years) for an independent assessment? why is this organization been so tight lid when talking about it's finances? let the people know what your financial books say. That would be a good starting point to clean up all your acts.
|
|
|
NayaSadak
Please log in to subscribe to NayaSadak's postings.
Posted on 12-19-10 3:39
PM [Snapshot: 800]
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
ग्यास मा नेपाली मनेजर भा ठाउँ मा महिनमा २ पल्ट् जस्तो पैसा पुगेन भनी नेपाली सँगइ पैसा लिई खोल्तिमा हाल्ने , तिमी जुठे हरु नेपालका मान्छे लाई नाना भाती भन्थ्यौ , यो मुजी नेपालीको आदत नेपालमा बसोस वा बिदेस देखाइ हाल्यो जात . गिदडकी खाल बादली जा सकती है लेकिन आदते कभी नही ,
|
|
|
JavaBeans
Please log in to subscribe to JavaBeans's postings.
Posted on 12-19-10 7:35
PM [Snapshot: 874]
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Supposedly, this is the letter initiating an impeachment?
I have never met Hari Sharma and do not know much about him, but as you know there are good reasons why many Nepali professionals prefer not to be associated with ANA, and this latest debacle is one of them. ANA has always given an aroma of malfeasance, for a lack of a better word. Surely, you would expect a non-profit to be transparent about their finances and publish them for all to see? Still better yet, the board which oversees the current administration could simply use the power of the bylaws to initiate an impeachment if an independent audit committee has found them to have misbehaved and/or to be incompetent. Reference to anecdotes concerning Nixon and the fate of a guilt-ridden persona in the hands of a vulture is truly unnecessary.
I also believe that as a senior board member one should have the conviction of independence and impartial judgment between what the audit committee says and actions of the current administration. ANA's members elect them (or are they self elected?) to follow the bylaws to its every word and to act in a manner that brings benefits to the members. No board member should subscribe to the promotion of self-interest, elitism, condescendence, wrath and snobbish behavior, utter incompetence - and those at the end who possess these qualities but exonerate themselves free of any ill conceived mannerisms should voluntarily step down.
Sometimes I wonder whether these executive committee members are fit to lead an organization when they are battling with ethical dilemmas of their own, not to mention the lack of effective soft skills to communicate with one another?
Last edited: 19-Dec-10 07:48 PM
|
|